Just finished playing about 20 minutes on each of #1c and then #1; #2 is full ATM. I'm in Mass. so that's why my pings are higher than some of the other players'.
#1
Ping was steady 80-90ms.
Choke was near 0 most of the time, rarely going over 3 or over 5 in combat. Did not notice choke go over about 7.
Noticed loss some of the time, rarely exceeding 3.
Joining was pretty good, choke went up to 15ish but came down abnormally fast.
Overall the performance was great; server had 23-24 players the entire time I was playing.
#2
Did not play, server was full at 27.
#1c
Ping was very steady 55-60ms.
Choke was near 0 most of the time, but went up to about 5-7 in combat, and sometimes spiked as high as 15ish.
Joining game was as normal, choke went quickly to 20ish and came down at a reasonable rate.
Overall the performance was good and lag-free; server had between 8 and 15 players while I was in there.
My overall impression is that #1 was better than #1c. The choke was 0 more of the time, and did not spike nearly as high in combat (7ish compared to occasional 15ish), despite having roughly double the players. Did notice a small amount of loss on #1 which I did not notice on #1c (I may not have been paying attention), but it did not seem to effect gameplay. I can't explain why my ping should be higher in #1 than in #1c though, since my understanding is that both are in Chicago.
Hope this helps
--mookie