Liltard

Gamerscoalition too, but I haven't seen the one you sent me... whatever you sent me will do. Thanks MK. LT

Can you make me one that says "LT-5"? LT

Yes, I was there. Yes, this guy should never play on our servers again. I actually logged off and posted on our private boards with his steam ID for a ban and our admins showed up several minutes later. Unfortunately neither Alba nor myeslf is an admin so we couldn't do it immediately. I like that everyone is keeping a watchful eye to keep this server a great place to play. Thanks Clue. LT

thank you bean and brillow for logging on and cleaning up. LT

This guy was on at approximately 6:18, went by the names: Go*k, n*gger, maryann, scotita, and a few more. Multiple tks, refused to change his names, team switches with more tks. Cleared the server from 24 to 12 in about 3 minutes. Steam id 0:0:414480 This guy does not fit the profile of someone we want playing there and he was warned. I asked him to change his name from n*gger, he did, then waited until the round was well underway before tking me. LT

There just isn't enough recoil with the rapid firing - making it the gun of choice if you plan to sit back and snipe. I never buy them and I hate nothing more than being killed by one... but I don't think we should take them out. Speaking of shields, I didn't think they were even in Source... I guess just because I really only play on Recrud. I only played 1.6 for a couple weeks, did shields ruin game mechanics? Just wondering why we don't have them in the game. LT

I want to go back, go back, and do it all over... but I can't go back, I know. Is this going to turn into a thread of people posting their old high school accomplishments? LT

Isn't it fun to find spelling mistakes in forum threads?! The ability to pick out spelling mistakes is always a sign of intelligence! LT

I thought that was a picture of chicks... LT

Since I had been absent from CS for awhile and had never played on GC servers until Source, I was wondering, did GC run stats on their CS servers in the past? Any plans for stats in the future? Someone asked about this in the public forum and I was just wondering what you all felt?. In the past, I know I would tend to spend more time on CS servers that tracked stats, which makes me believe that it may draw more to our servers. Anyway, I'm not even sure if there is a stat tracker program for Source. Just wondering. LT

Wow, if that is the case we should all be having the name %n. I just figured anyone who was still trying the %n name should be banned for even trying it as I thought it was showing an intent to be a jerk. Good to know. LT

I agree the .gc isn't exactly in your face... it's actually hard to even notice it in the .gc format as it looks like a simple continuation of the name rather than a tag. What kind of formats for names and tags does CS allow? LT

Fatty, Of my 60 posts, only 3 have been unhappy in nature and all were in regards to reserve status. Within these 3 posts, I went out of my way to state how much I enjoy playing with this group of people and on this group of servers. I chose to speak up on the issue of reserve status because it needed to be addressed. Especially in light of a poll suggesting a possible increase in dues. I never suggested, demanded, or implied that this was about wanting my money back or that I preferred to remove myself from GC if reserve access wasn't implemented. This was your suggestion and I don't see how this would solve anything other than to grease the squeaky wheel. This isn't "my" issue. It's an issue for anyone who read the FAQ and was enticed to join because of the reserve access and to everyone, from those paying $25/year to those paying $150/year, in GC. I enjoy being a part of GC, regardless of reserve access, and I appreciate the work that those, most notably yourself, do to make it a great place to spend some my leisure time. I apologize that my posts were taken personally as I feel they must have been to have it suggested that my money be given back and I just leave. As for the avatar, it's not demonstrating anger or frustration. It's demonstrating being dumb. LT

Fatty, Do I want my money back? Is this the solution? As this was addressed in the thread regarding the possibility of raising dues I won't drag it out. I simply think we should not be advertising that we have reserve access for members. I hardly think anyone in GC can disagree with this. I appreciate the work of those, such as Chipper, who are trying to implement a system that works for reserve access but the fact of the matter is, it does not exist. As for CS:S, I know it was just released but that does not change the fact that what was/is promised does not exist. I am happy I joined GC. As I said before, I enjoy playing with and against those in GC, on an excellent group of well run servers for multiple games despite the fact that the primary reason I joined was for reserve access. I did not and am not asking for my money back. For all I care you can give my money to Wentz so he can buy a new video card. I am simply troubled that this service doesn't exist and new members joining for the same reason will likewise be disappointed. LT

So what you're saying is there is no reserve access in any of our game servers? LT

What do we need to do to get reserved access for Source? Anyone we need to PM with our steam ID? Thanks in advance, LT

Can someone give me the info to track down steam ID's to ban. Lots of garbage going on tonight that should be passed on to the admins. LT

Please add me on if I'm not on the list: liltard id = 09965ecd-6040d940-3d330545-f2a29da5

Tracing route to 66.150.107.32 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 12 ms 11 ms 12 ms 10.230.0.1 2 12 ms 14 ms 12 ms ubr02-p2-0.whithe1.mn.attbb.net [24.31.1.158] 3 11 ms 14 ms 13 ms bic03-p2-3.rosehe1.mn.attbb.net [24.31.1.190] 4 13 ms 13 ms 14 ms 24.31.1.166 5 14 ms 13 ms 12 ms 24.31.2.81 6 26 ms 23 ms 25 ms 12.118.239.169 7 25 ms 25 ms 23 ms tbr2-p012301.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.13] 8 24 ms 25 ms 24 ms ggr2-p390.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.37] 9 104 ms 22 ms 24 ms dcr1-so-3-3-0.Chicago.savvis.net [208.175.10.93] 10 22 ms 23 ms 24 ms dcr2-loopback.Chicago.savvis.net [208.172.2.100] 11 23 ms 24 ms 22 ms bpr1-ae0.ChicagoEquinix.savvis.net [208.174.226. 85] 12 26 ms 23 ms 24 ms 208.174.226.98 13 23 ms 24 ms 23 ms border5.ge4-1-bbnet2.chg.pnap.net [64.94.32.74] 14 22 ms 24 ms 24 ms prohosting-2.border5.chg.pnap.net [64.94.34.202] 15 22 ms 24 ms 23 ms 66.150.107.32 Trace complete. LT