Fatty August 1, 2005 Share Fatty GC Founder August 1, 2005 Here's what I would like to see....tonight when all servers are full: Play for 10 minutes in each server while they're all full. Make notes. Then report like this. #1 69.12.89.6 ping: choke level and observations: load times, general feel, registering, etc: #2 69.12.89.96 ping: choke level and observations: load times, general feel, registering, etc: #1c 205.138.197.170 ping: choke level and observations: load times, general feel, registering, etc: going to ask the same of the public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bush August 1, 2005 Share Bush Member August 1, 2005 Tons better on one. Normally don't play there but the highest choke I saw was 15, otherwise it was close to 0 the whole time. Off to two.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 1, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 1, 2005 Public topic is here: http://www.gamrs.co/forums/in...showtopic=19815 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bush August 1, 2005 Share Bush Member August 1, 2005 #2 69.12.89.96 Ping: normal, 50 or under....... Choke\Loss's: Like it was prior to July 4th... Well under 10 the whole time, everything felt like it did in June. Load times: One of the first in like back in June. Prior to this I was getting in after 10 players or so, prior to July 4th I was one of the first in.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 1, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 1, 2005 Try to put all 3 in a row when you're done. Also, good point on rates: http://www.gamrs.co/forums/in...t=0#entry244797 Have em all the same when you test, whatever you test at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilzugud August 1, 2005 Share Kilzugud Member August 1, 2005 fine for me, its not the server anymore i have probs with, its my connection that has been "fixed" 13 times alone this month and still isnt workin well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bush August 1, 2005 Share Bush Member August 1, 2005 #1 was the same as #2 as far as server performance is concerned.. Rates: cl_cmdrate 101 cl_updaterate 101 cl_rate 20000 rate 25000 Thanks M2... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 1, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 1, 2005 can someone please start using the format I asked for and post only after you've tried ALL THREE SERVERS while they are full TONIGHT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaM2 August 1, 2005 Share akaM2 Member August 1, 2005 (edited) My experience with all the servers. Xgs Stock #1 Ping: 75-90 Loss: 1-3 Choke: 10-35 Xgs scopeless #2 Ping: 75-90 Loss: 0-1 Choke: 5-20 Funservers #1b Ping: 50-60 Loss: 0-0 Choke: 0-15 Aim2game Stock #1C Ping: 45-55 Loss: 0 Choke: 0-5 Registration was on point with the aim2game server, that will happen when it is running at 100tic. It almost seemed like I was playing in one of CsLs's CAL matches just because it ran smooth and when you pulled the trigger and shot someone, it actually went were you shot them. The only way to get similar registration on a 33 or 66 tick server is to put cl_interpolate 0 on, and nobody really likes playing with that. Winner Aim2game!!! I have always been impressed with our private server from them and there public just impresses me more. Edited August 1, 2005 by M2.gc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 1, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 1, 2005 thank you for the all-inclusive format! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brillow_Head August 1, 2005 Share Brillow_Head Member August 1, 2005 Xgs Stock #1 Ping: 50-60 Loss: 1 Choke: 0-7 Very smooth. Xgs scopeless #2 Ping: 50-65 Loss: 0-1 Choke: 0-4 I'm in love. Aim2game Stock #1C Ping: 55-65 Loss: 0 Choke: 0-3 Plays just like the other two. As far as I'm concerned, whatever they did to our servers....it's fixed. Scopeless is 150% better than it use to be. BRILLOW SEAL OF APPROVAL. rate 25000 cl_updaterate 20 cl_cmdrate 30 cl_interp 0 cl_upspeed 320 cl_lagcomp_errorcheck 1 fps_max 85 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 1, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 1, 2005 It was just rates in the server.cfg that we had never changed. We had them the same the entire time, then for some reason, things started deteriorating? Barry changed the rates that we could have easily changed, and choke nearly goes away. I think you'd need to have your rates jacked up a little to take advantage of the 100 tickrate on 1c....at least that's what I keep hearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 1, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 1, 2005 It was just rates in the server.cfg that we had never changed. We had them the same the entire time, then for some reason, things started deteriorating? Barry changed the rates that we could have easily changed, and choke nearly goes away. I think you'd need to have your rates jacked up a little to take advantage of the 100 tickrate on 1c....at least that's what I keep hearing. Thanks for a nother good report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 1, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 1, 2005 It was just rates in the server.cfg that we had never changed.....wait, I take that back. That's all I know that was changed. Who the heck knows what else could have been changed. I don't know if servers were moved off boxes or anything else. I can only discuss what I have access to. We had them the same the entire time, then for some reason, things started deteriorating? Barry changed the rates that we could have easily changed, and choke nearly goes away. I think you'd need to have your rates jacked up a little to take advantage of the 100 tickrate on 1c....at least that's what I keep hearing. Thanks for a nother good report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brillow_Head August 1, 2005 Share Brillow_Head Member August 1, 2005 Yeah, I could have run 1c at cl_updaterate 100 and cl_cmdrate 100 but it would only prove that you could run it this way. I don't know if it would make a huge deal. I just wanted to make sure they ran the same with the same rates. Would price be an issue for a 100 tickrate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 1, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 1, 2005 With XGS? It's not an option. He can't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie August 2, 2005 Share mookie GC Alumni August 2, 2005 Just finished playing about 20 minutes on each of #1c and then #1; #2 is full ATM. I'm in Mass. so that's why my pings are higher than some of the other players'. #1 Ping was steady 80-90ms. Choke was near 0 most of the time, rarely going over 3 or over 5 in combat. Did not notice choke go over about 7. Noticed loss some of the time, rarely exceeding 3. Joining was pretty good, choke went up to 15ish but came down abnormally fast. Overall the performance was great; server had 23-24 players the entire time I was playing. #2 Did not play, server was full at 27. #1c Ping was very steady 55-60ms. Choke was near 0 most of the time, but went up to about 5-7 in combat, and sometimes spiked as high as 15ish. Joining game was as normal, choke went quickly to 20ish and came down at a reasonable rate. Overall the performance was good and lag-free; server had between 8 and 15 players while I was in there. My overall impression is that #1 was better than #1c. The choke was 0 more of the time, and did not spike nearly as high in combat (7ish compared to occasional 15ish), despite having roughly double the players. Did notice a small amount of loss on #1 which I did not notice on #1c (I may not have been paying attention), but it did not seem to effect gameplay. I can't explain why my ping should be higher in #1 than in #1c though, since my understanding is that both are in Chicago. Hope this helps --mookie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadow August 2, 2005 Share shadow Member August 2, 2005 last night on 1.5 was great no lag no nothing. Great server Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shep48 August 2, 2005 Share shep48 Member August 2, 2005 mookie and others if you are getting any choke, try the rates fatty posted sv_maxrate 25000 cl_updaterate 20 cl_cmdrate 30 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 2, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 2, 2005 last night on 1.5 was great no lag no nothing. Great server <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You were on 1c. Sorry to confuse you....1.5 turned into 1b. You were on the a2g server listed above as 1c. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preacher August 2, 2005 Share Preacher Member August 2, 2005 sorry not to use your format but I'm short on time, I ping best at 1c with almost no loss/choke I think a2g is the way to go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anonymo August 2, 2005 Share anonymo Member August 2, 2005 (edited) #1 ping 70-89 / latency 54-63 choke 2 / loss 0 ping is the only thing that affects gameplay #2 ping 79 / latency 65 choke 0 / loss 2 ping is the only thing that affects gameplay #1b ping 47 / latency 37 choke 50max / loss 0 gets choppy but odly not while choke is up, choke doesn't have a noticable effect in firefights even though its high #1c ping 60 / latency 50 choke 4-9 / loss 0 occasional choppyness otherwise plays like 1&2 cl_cmdrate 100 cl_updaterate 480 cl_rate 88000 rate 450000 3.9Mb/s down / 743Kb/s up in Montreal Quebec 750 miles (1206 km) from Chicago Edited August 2, 2005 by anonymo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope August 3, 2005 Share Pope Member August 3, 2005 Xgs Stock #1 Ping: 50-60 Loss: 1-2 Choke: 0-6 Xgs scopeless #2 Ping: 50-60 Loss: 0-1 Choke: 0-4 I'm in love. Aim2game Stock #1C Ping: 50-60 Loss: 0 Choke: 0-3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty August 3, 2005 Author Share Fatty GC Founder August 3, 2005 Should we make 1c test server scopeless for a couple days? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScubaDan August 3, 2005 Share ScubaDan Member August 3, 2005 Should we make 1c test server scopeless for a couple days? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes Please!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now