Blitz June 8, 2006 Share Blitz Member June 8, 2006 GET RID OF ASSAULT!!!!!!! (please) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stutters June 9, 2006 Share stutters GC Alumni June 9, 2006 noted thanks for the feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witt June 9, 2006 Share witt Member June 9, 2006 I propose a no cs_assault man-law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ric3 e4ter June 9, 2006 Share ric3 e4ter Member June 9, 2006 ill sign your petition if there is one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witt June 9, 2006 Share witt Member June 9, 2006 you poke it you pwn it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aMnesiac June 9, 2006 Share aMnesiac Member June 9, 2006 (edited) Not a fan of this either... not to hijack your thread, but what do you guys think about Port? Also not a fan of that one. Edited June 9, 2006 by aMnesiac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kruten June 9, 2006 Share Kruten Member June 9, 2006 I propose a no cs_assault man-law That has been done every time the map has been added to one of the server's map cycles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stutters June 9, 2006 Share stutters GC Alumni June 9, 2006 Not a fan of this either... not to hijack your thread, but what do you guys think about Port? Also not a fan of that one.no hijack detected. the door is always open for map rotation suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tWc|WhiteyFord June 9, 2006 Share tWc|WhiteyFord Member June 9, 2006 ok here is a great idea, make the assault and port maps non awp or scout and then it will be much for fun. Try this out john i think people might like it alot more. what yall think. just give it a chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadow June 9, 2006 Share shadow Member June 9, 2006 I'm with whitey. If ya make it no-awp it makes both maps more interesting, and fun to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stutters June 9, 2006 Share stutters GC Alumni June 9, 2006 what yall think. just give it a chancewhitey, you're a great man with great ideas. i'm willing to give it a chance. any objections? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s|im smi|ey June 9, 2006 Share s|im smi|ey Member June 9, 2006 no matter what .... it's still a t sided map...... but I'll try it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stutters June 9, 2006 Share stutters GC Alumni June 9, 2006 we could revive logistic_assault. i don't think anyone is brave enough to call that a t sided map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie June 9, 2006 Share mookie GC Alumni June 9, 2006 Another one worth looking at might be cs_assault_upc_css (loaded on Mayhem). Logistic can be very tough on the Ts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raw-C June 11, 2006 Share Raw-C Member June 11, 2006 I'm all good with whatever map rotation. And while the weapon restriction might make the maps more fun, I've always enjoyed the no restriction, no stupid mods part of West STOCK. Ultimately, I'll probably play it anyway, but I'd prefer to not have anything restricted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dEL June 13, 2006 Share dEL Member June 13, 2006 logistic_assault I thought was cool. CTs actually have a chance to win. Regular assault is not good for pub. Taking away awp in port is a bad idea thats what big open maps are for, snipers. dEL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z3RO June 13, 2006 Share Z3RO Member June 13, 2006 (edited) panic set port up with no awps once was alot of fun not alot of complning but it got boring after a while Edited June 13, 2006 by Z3RO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitz June 19, 2006 Author Share Blitz Member June 19, 2006 I didnt play logistic assault on t's side a lot but from what i did play it was a pretty balanced map. And the thing with port, at least its balanced(given there are good snipers on both teams) assault - awps = t map still. port - awps = balanced map still. Im up for either one but I also do like the whole no mod thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now