Fatty July 25, 2006 Share Fatty GC Founder July 25, 2006 Recrud stuff here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty July 25, 2006 Author Share Fatty GC Founder July 25, 2006 Recrud has been reinstalled. Admin is off, reserves are off.....everything is off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brillow_Head July 26, 2006 Share Brillow_Head Member July 26, 2006 (edited) You're not going to like this....this is for all three new servers C:\Documents and Settings\brillow>tracert 216.52.148.55 Tracing route to c-216-52-148-55.internap-chicago.nuclearfallout.net [216.52.148 .55] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 14 ms 17 ms 46 ms 10.18.168.1 2 28 ms 18 ms 19 ms 12-215-17-193.client.mchsi.com [12.215.17.193] 3 25 ms 16 ms 19 ms 12-215-2-130.client.mchsi.com [12.215.2.130] 4 35 ms 38 ms 42 ms tbr2-p010103.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.80.10] 5 29 ms 30 ms 26 ms gbr2-p40.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.54] 6 35 ms 45 ms 27 ms gar1-p370.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.193.157] 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 46 ms 32 ms 43 ms border10.ge3-0-bbnet2.chi.pnap.net [216.52.128.7 8] 9 28 ms 28 ms 38 ms c-216-52-148-55.internap-chicago.nuclearfallout. net [216.52.148.55] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\brillow>tracert 216.52.148.55 Tracing route to c-216-52-148-55.internap-chicago.nuclearfallout.net [216.52.148 .55] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 14 ms 17 ms 46 ms 10.18.168.1 2 28 ms 18 ms 19 ms 12-215-17-193.client.mchsi.com [12.215.17.193] 3 25 ms 16 ms 19 ms 12-215-2-130.client.mchsi.com [12.215.2.130] 4 35 ms 38 ms 42 ms tbr2-p010103.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.80.10] 5 29 ms 30 ms 26 ms gbr2-p40.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.54] 6 35 ms 45 ms 27 ms gar1-p370.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.193.157] 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 46 ms 32 ms 43 ms border10.ge3-0-bbnet2.chi.pnap.net [216.52.128.7 8] 9 28 ms 28 ms 38 ms c-216-52-148-55.internap-chicago.nuclearfallout. net [216.52.148.55] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\brillow>tracert 216.52.148.55 Tracing route to c-216-52-148-55.internap-chicago.nuclearfallout.net [216.52.148 .55] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 14 ms 17 ms 46 ms 10.18.168.1 2 28 ms 18 ms 19 ms 12-215-17-193.client.mchsi.com [12.215.17.193] 3 25 ms 16 ms 19 ms 12-215-2-130.client.mchsi.com [12.215.2.130] 4 35 ms 38 ms 42 ms tbr2-p010103.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.80.10] 5 29 ms 30 ms 26 ms gbr2-p40.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.54] 6 35 ms 45 ms 27 ms gar1-p370.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.193.157] 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 46 ms 32 ms 43 ms border10.ge3-0-bbnet2.chi.pnap.net [216.52.128.7 8] 9 28 ms 28 ms 38 ms c-216-52-148-55.internap-chicago.nuclearfallout. net [216.52.148.55] Trace complete. .........now what? Edited July 26, 2006 by Brillow_Head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stutters July 26, 2006 Share stutters GC Alumni July 26, 2006 post/edit in a good trace that reveals that mystery 7th hop. if it's an ATT transit, there's not much we can do. if it's a pnap, that should be under NFO's jurismydiction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty July 26, 2006 Author Share Fatty GC Founder July 26, 2006 Strange that you can get zero back from it yet it sends through. Maybe it's just a setting there, because you have no packetloss at the final destination....sorta like how my router denies requests. Not sure. Strange tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayfarer July 26, 2006 Share wayfarer Member July 26, 2006 Just got off Recrud. My shot registration went down the toilet, also people were picking me off long after I was behind cover. I know this happens occasionally, but this was really bad, like a full second. Are we sure these servers are what we really want? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie July 26, 2006 Share mookie GC Alumni July 26, 2006 100% loss from some hop is no big deal, it just means that that particular router is not sending off ICMP messages for the TTL expiration. This from a few minutes ago on stripped Recrud, shortly after a restart/crash or something (whatever shut it down happened before I got on): This lasted for the better part of a minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty July 26, 2006 Author Share Fatty GC Founder July 26, 2006 welp, that's one. if it's isolated....i didn't have the sv_downloadurl defined....there were several ?'s connected, but perhaps couldn't d/l the map. It's a stretch, but I defined the url manually and then they finished their connect. Who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farmerisme July 26, 2006 Share farmerisme Member July 26, 2006 Played on the naked server for a few maps tonight... seemed to run pretty good, never saw a lag spike myself, ping still tasty good, registration... who knows... seemed good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie July 26, 2006 Share mookie GC Alumni July 26, 2006 According to the players in the server there was just a ping event around 3am. I'm on Mayhem so I can't get a screen of it and it lasted less than a minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty July 26, 2006 Author Share Fatty GC Founder July 26, 2006 Every ping spike that we've documented hasn't shown up in a trace. If you can show a ping spike in hlsw, then we need a trace to go with it, otherwise it's useless. The pictures in game are assuming that traces outside of the game are normal. However, you won't have your graph messed like that w/o a route issue, or proof in a tracert that it's the last hop that is the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shep48 July 26, 2006 Share shep48 Member July 26, 2006 it just happend couple times in a row, 30 seconds of lag, then 3-4 mins of normal, then lag. nothing showed up on the plotter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EbilDustBunny July 26, 2006 Share EbilDustBunny GC Alumni July 26, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunk July 26, 2006 Share Lunk Member July 26, 2006 Just an fyi. I'm currently playing on Recrud and it seems a bit choppy today. I was running pingplotter before jumping on and I noticed I was getting upto 33% packet loss at times on the last couple of chicago hops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stutters July 27, 2006 Share stutters GC Alumni July 27, 2006 during server wide lag on recrud i had a jump on my traceroute on an SBC -> SAVIS hop ex1-p3-0.eqsjca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.41.101] bpr2-ge-6-0-0.SanJoseEquinix.savvis.net [151.164.89.42] nothing closer to the gameserver though. (those are hops 7-8 out of 17) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrX July 27, 2006 Share mrX GC Alumni July 27, 2006 Last 2 hops for the last 5 hours have been rock steady for me. Looks like nothing over a 40. Last 5 hours to Recrud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stutters July 27, 2006 Share stutters GC Alumni July 27, 2006 again--used startlag stoplag via console chat. the trace showed nothing, though there was momentary 10% packetloss on #14 Target Name: recrud.gamerscoalition.com IP: 216.52.148.55 Date/Time: 7/26/2006 6:34:11 PM to 7/26/2006 6:34:38 PM 1 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms [192.168.1.1] 2 9 ms 10 ms 13 ms 10 ms 29 ms 232 ms 16 ms 16 ms 9 ms 9 ms bras10-l0.pltnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.184.66] 3 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms dist2-vlan50.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.97.67] 4 8 ms 8 ms 17 ms 9 ms 7 ms 8 ms 7 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms bb2-10g2-0.pltnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.42.102] 5 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms bb1-p10-0.pltnca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.43.102] 6 9 ms 28 ms 78 ms 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 8 ms bb1-p4-0.crsfca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.41.5] 7 11 ms 11 ms 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms ex1-p3-0.eqsjca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.41.101] 8 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms 10 ms 10 ms 12 ms bpr2-ge-6-0-0.SanJoseEquinix.savvis.net [151.164.89.42] 9 17 ms 14 ms 12 ms 17 ms 11 ms 11 ms 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms 11 ms dcr2-so-3-2-0.SanFranciscosfo.savvis.net [206.24.211.77] 10 13 ms 13 ms 12 ms 13 ms 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms 18 ms 12 ms 12 ms dcr1-so-5-0-0.SanFranciscosfo.savvis.net [204.70.192.149] 11 64 ms 64 ms 64 ms 64 ms 63 ms 63 ms 64 ms 64 ms 63 ms 63 ms dcr2-so-0-0-0.Denver.savvis.net [204.70.192.113] 12 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms 119 ms 68 ms 67 ms 68 ms 67 ms 68 ms dcr1-so-7-0-0.Chicago.savvis.net [204.70.192.134] 13 67 ms 67 ms 105 ms 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms 68 ms 96 ms 67 ms 67 ms dcr2-so-5-0-0.Chicago.savvis.net [204.70.192.46] 14 66 ms 66 ms 67 ms 67 ms 66 ms 66 ms 66 ms 66 ms 67 ms 67 ms acr2-so-0-0-0.chicago.savvis.net [208.172.3.82] 15 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms 68 ms 68 ms 67 ms 235 ms [208.172.10.202] 16 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms 68 ms 66 ms 67 ms 66 ms 68 ms 67 ms 66 ms border10.ge3-0-bbnet2.chi.pnap.net [216.52.128.78] 17 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms 71 ms 67 ms 66 ms 69 ms 68 ms 66 ms 67 ms c-216-52-148-55.internap-chicago.nuclearfallout.net [216.52.148.55] Ping statistics for recrud.gamerscoalition.com Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0.0%) Round Trip Times: Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 71ms, Average = 67ms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayfarer July 27, 2006 Share wayfarer Member July 27, 2006 Have we been able to rule out mani yet? We really need to get the admins back up & running on Recrud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie July 27, 2006 Share mookie GC Alumni July 27, 2006 Didn't we have troubles with Savvis on XGS also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max67 July 27, 2006 Share Max67 Member July 27, 2006 There has been lag here for more then 3 minutes or so... THe pigns are 700-1000... Ill post screeneis later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w8t4time July 27, 2006 Share w8t4time Member July 27, 2006 yea i couldn't join server full???? 12:20 central time; then when i did only a few left and all complained about 800-1000 latency issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laz.e.rus July 27, 2006 Share Laz.e.rus Member July 27, 2006 Theres something up with both mayhem and rec at the same time rt now ( at time of post) . I noticed my ping was pretty high to both, but I just assumed it was me. Then after a rcon-status, it showed most everyone in the server also had a very high ping as well. Oddly, my ping to the new west seems unusually low at the same time ( cool) couple mins later, checked again, booted two potty mouths, and pings look back to normal except for 2 people ( prolly them). xtLux is in server now and is pinging normally he says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max67 July 27, 2006 Share Max67 Member July 27, 2006 This lag lasted about 5 minutes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrX July 27, 2006 Share mrX GC Alumni July 27, 2006 http://www.gamrs.co/forums/in...nce&f=249&id=60 They're changing a router or something in chicago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EbilDustBunny July 28, 2006 Share EbilDustBunny GC Alumni July 28, 2006 again between 10:50pm and 4:00am CDT starting on 7/27 I dunno would they start early lets hope so.... we had like a couple lag spikes that've noticed... once i saw recrude time out for a little bit but never crashed... I was watching on HLSW. One spike acted funny... it was like it was going back down then it jumped up again lasted around 3 rounds. i got screenies but i figure you'd be bored of seeing them by now >_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now