auggybendoggy November 11, 2006 Share auggybendoggy Member November 11, 2006 Guys, I'm a long time norton user and I'm sick of it. I know that 2003, 2004, 2005 all have a bun that arbitrairily causes them to turn the security off leaving you exposed. I've read about it and I'm tired of waiting a year to see when a new version will come out that does not have this. I know you guys are truly learned and am hoping you all can tell me which is a better firewall. Heres a good way to start. Panda is out. I hate this wall more than norton. so lets start from there. Auggy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie November 11, 2006 Share mookie GC Alumni November 11, 2006 If all you need is a firewall, just get a NAT which will drop any incoming connections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goofus Maximus November 11, 2006 Share Goofus Maximus Member November 11, 2006 If you're using Windows XP, then you won't be hurting too much by just using the built in Windows firewall. For Linux, there are many front-ends that give you a nice graphical "firewall" to configure, while doing all the IPTables rulemaking so you don't have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laz.e.rus November 11, 2006 Share Laz.e.rus Member November 11, 2006 Theres a few good freebies out there. Ive had weak ones, and Ive run one so strong I had to approve every single thing you could imagine. Google ftw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auggybendoggy November 11, 2006 Author Share auggybendoggy Member November 11, 2006 is the windows really good? I thought that thing would be cracked in 2 days : ) Aug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo November 11, 2006 Share Cujo Member November 11, 2006 if you have a router you already have a firewall and need not worry. if you don't then just use the built-in firewall with windows sp2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfsblood November 11, 2006 Share Wolfsblood Member November 11, 2006 I like zonealarm, but mainly use the built in one on my router. ZA just makes sure nothing gets out that I don't want to get out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akaM2 November 11, 2006 Share akaM2 Member November 11, 2006 if you have a router you already have a firewall and need not worry. if you don't then just use the built-in firewall with windows sp2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Slaughterâ„¢-TopBrass November 12, 2006 Share Sgt. Slaughterâ„¢-TopBrass Member November 12, 2006 For the times I'm on a different network or not behind a router, I use Windows LiveOne Care firewall. The only reason I use it is because I have some folders I share for work that have top secret eyes only stuff in them ( ). I've had it for about 4 months now, and I like it so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metallurgic November 13, 2006 Share Metallurgic Member November 13, 2006 Sygate is a good software firewall, unfortunately it was discontinued. You can still use it to filter anything you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auggybendoggy November 13, 2006 Author Share auggybendoggy Member November 13, 2006 ok, i've got a linksys wireless router. Does it have a firewall? if so how do I enable it? Aug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie November 13, 2006 Share mookie GC Alumni November 13, 2006 Any NAT (Network Address Translation) router will act as a firewall. When packets come in to the router, it needs to know where they go (since there could be any number of machines behind the NAT). If the packets aren't coming in to a port that's already being used for one of the machines (or a port you've manually set a forwarding rule for), they just get dropped. It's equivalent to putting a switchboard in your house, and then giving yourself some arbitrary extension. When a telemarketer calls, they probably won't know what extension you're at, and they're not going to sit there and try every one. A NAT generally won't do some of the more interesting stuff that some software firewalls do, like blocking traffic to specific programs. It should protect you 100% against anything trying to attack your computer out of the blue, but is no protection at all against anyone exploiting some weakness of a program that you're using to browse the web, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auggybendoggy November 15, 2006 Author Share auggybendoggy Member November 15, 2006 mookie, are you saying using both a router for cloaking on the net and use software to ward off attacks when programs are exploited? Aug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mookie November 15, 2006 Share mookie GC Alumni November 15, 2006 I'm saying that a router won't protect against some stuff, specifically stuff that you might inadvertantly bring onto yourself when downloading screensavers or w/e. I think an on-access scanner like what many antivirus programs have will take care of a lot of that. Depending on how careful you are and what websites you look at, you probably don't need antivirus software at all if you're protected by a NAT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now