It may just have been my random thoughts going where you hadnt meant for them to go
Anyway, my thought went something like this: If "breaching the code and going against the society = doing what is 'wrong/bad'", the code being created by society - then if no one in that society knows it's been broken then can me the murderer truly be shown to be "wrong"? If no one knows I've murdered except me, and I dont have a problem with it, then I'm actually not in the wrong yet because I'm not held accountable. On the other hand, if a higher being created the morals, then I'm held accountable even if no one ever finds out.
I hope me trying to word my random thoughts works
Feel free to just say "I dont follow" and I'll just drop it at that
A societal morallity is instilled and reinforced throughout a persons life. From when you are a baby, and your parents tell you, "you can't take that, its not yours", or, "don't hit, thats not nice" you are being taught what it takes to be apart of the society you live in. There is no moral vaccum in a society, it is drilled into our heads from birth and from every angle. By the time we start school we KNOW what is right and wrong.
To address your specific comment, unless you are caught you can not be punished. So as far as the society knows, you did no wrong. That is true. However, nearly every person who has murdered (excepting those that are trully insane) has known that what they did was wrong. Religion, as I stated in my other post, has an amplifying effect on the societal moral code. Regardless of what God/Gods people worship, they are a reflection of the society that created it (We can argue whether God is real or not untill we both die and find out for sure, so I'm not trying to bait you with that comment .), and they reinforce the societal morals with the idea of rewards or retribution after death. Religion, in its endless forms, has been with humans nearly since we started walking upright, and so has been apart of every society there has ever been.
Thinking about it, both arguments are right in a way. If you go with the argument that society creates the morallity, and molds the religion to reinforce it, or the argument that religion creates the morallity and molds society to reinforce it, its a difference without much distiction. Society and religion are so intermingled, and have been for essentially our entire history, that they are nearly indistiguishable. For me, since I'm a Deist, I believe that society created the moral code, and religion to reinforce it. For you, since you are a Christian, you believe that your God created the moral code, and society reinforces it. Shrug, I could argue that Hammurabi's Code (1800 B.C.E.) has nearly the same moral message as we have now, and that they did not worship the God of Abraham. At which point you could argue that while the name might be different, there is only one God, so their moral code came from the same God as you. As with any question related to religion we just end up in an endless loop heh .
Don't think I answered anything in all that mess above, but I had fun thinking about ithe problem:).
Shaftiel
P.S. forgive the misspellings, I lack the time today to spell check heh .