Biggs May 26, 2013 Share Biggs GC Alumni May 26, 2013 See the poll above, pretty self-explanatory. If you have other ideas, let us know. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackieChan May 26, 2013 Share JackieChan GC Alumni May 26, 2013 Retro had a pretty good balance with 2 per team. Maybe let the losing team buy a couple more if it's by a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaRvIn May 26, 2013 Share MaRvIn Member May 26, 2013 No, 2 per team no matter what the case is a good idea. Some maps it is ridiculous when a team has 4 awps and 3 autos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkingCat May 26, 2013 Share walkingCat Member May 26, 2013 2 yay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glgl May 26, 2013 Share glgl Member May 26, 2013 I always liked the 2 per team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clueless May 26, 2013 Share Clueless GC Alumni May 26, 2013 Not like it matters anyways, seems like people only hang out long enough to get a 5v5 match going these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glgl May 26, 2013 Share glgl Member May 26, 2013 Not like it matters anyways, seems like people only hang out long enough to get a 5v5 match going these days. I'm still around and pub a lot Would always rather play people I know aren't cheating instead of getting a scrim with 4 150+ pinging aimbotters ;E Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnbullTeRRoR May 26, 2013 Share turnbullTeRRoR GC Alumni May 26, 2013 I'm on the other end of the spectrum. I don't think over-awping or "awp (streetwalkers)" is no where near as big a problem in GO as it was in source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Girlzilla May 27, 2013 Share Girlzilla Member May 27, 2013 I vote no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VooDooPC May 27, 2013 Share VooDooPC Member May 27, 2013 I vote no. I vote you're part of the problem! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barashin May 27, 2013 Share Barashin Member May 27, 2013 5v5 is fun, but I think there will always be a place for some retro style CSGO. I voted no, since I don't think awps are that big of a problem either, but I don't really mind it either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
san` May 27, 2013 Share san` GC Alumni May 27, 2013 I vote no. I vote you're part of the problem! You obviously don't play with her much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Girlzilla May 27, 2013 Share Girlzilla Member May 27, 2013 I vote no. I vote you're part of the problem! You obviously don't play with her much My reason for voting no is that if there's only two per team, the best two AWPers are probably not me, so I'll have less chance to AWP and get better at it. *Shrugs* Just remember this from playing Source back in the day. Like Turnbull said, I don't feel it's a problem in GO compared to Source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnbullTeRRoR May 27, 2013 Share turnbullTeRRoR GC Alumni May 27, 2013 (edited) I vote no. I vote you're part of the problem! You obviously don't play with her much My reason for voting no is that if there's only two per team, the best two AWPers are probably not me, so I'll have less chance to AWP and get better at it. *Shrugs* Just remember this from playing Source back in the day. Like Turnbull said, I don't feel it's a problem in GO compared to Source. and to expand on that, the range of guns used is much broader in GO than source. I see almost all the guns used everymap. I've not seen a whole lot of 5 guys lined up at Mid to shoot awps like you would in source. Playing Aztec in source with out limits was almost unbearable but I've not felt that frustration in GO that I can recall. I say a compromise! If we limit awps we add stats! Edited May 27, 2013 by turnbullTeRRoR 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crasx May 28, 2013 Share crasx GC Alumni May 28, 2013 great now I'll never be good at this game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jibbajabba May 28, 2013 Share Jibbajabba Member May 28, 2013 I voted yes but was on the fence as I agree with many others that AWPs don't seem as big of an issue in GO as they were in Source. However I have not played GO nearly as much as I did Source so I wouldn't be surprised if it is abused on pubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jibbajabba May 28, 2013 Share Jibbajabba Member May 28, 2013 5v5 is fun, but I think there will always be a place for some retro style CSGO. I voted no, since I don't think awps are that big of a problem either, but I don't really mind it either way. I just started playing some 5v5 and agree it is fun, however the only time people are on the gc server is for Saturday night customs and I don't think 5v5 is going to go away anytime soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reomet May 28, 2013 Share Reomet Member May 28, 2013 I think restricting AWPs is a significant deterrent to people like me attempting to learn them. If my team is ahead and I have money to spare, I'll buy an AWP so I can try using it in an actual situation instead of the usual impromptu circumstance. I'm also not a huge fan of playing against a team of proficient AWPers. I'm torn on this, but I'm voting no because I've yet to see the same issues on the CS:GO pub that we had in CSS. I have to learn somehow and I'd rather not do it under high pressure circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnbullTeRRoR May 28, 2013 Share turnbullTeRRoR GC Alumni May 28, 2013 I think restricting AWPs is a significant deterrent to people like me attempting to learn them. If my team is ahead and I have money to spare, I'll buy an AWP so I can try using it in an actual situation instead of the usual impromptu circumstance. I'm also not a huge fan of playing against a team of proficient AWPers. I'm torn on this, but I'm voting no because I've yet to see the same issues on the CS:GO pub that we had in CSS. I have to learn somehow and I'd rather not do it under high pressure circumstances. also there is that ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnbullTeRRoR May 28, 2013 Share turnbullTeRRoR GC Alumni May 28, 2013 I'm hardcore advocate of VOTE NO on this poll and I hardly ever awp in pubs. "If it ain't broke don't fix it!" I don't see a problem and I think some peoples past experiences have biased them against the awp. In the end though this wouldn't bother me either way so I don't know why I'm overly concerned with blocking it. I reckon its because I've gotten better at awping and don't want to be blocked should I have the funds and feel the urge because some one is awp"@)#$ing" I mean when you limit to 2 you will see who they are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boiler May 28, 2013 Share boiler Member May 28, 2013 Over a decade later, and this battle still rages on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaftiel May 28, 2013 Share shaftiel Member May 28, 2013 I vote that we ban P90's instead. Shaftiel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reomet May 29, 2013 Share Reomet Member May 29, 2013 I vote that we ban P90's instead. *sigh* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnbullTeRRoR May 29, 2013 Share turnbullTeRRoR GC Alumni May 29, 2013 (edited) 24 members have cast votes....... 12-11 someone deleted....... come to the NO SIDE! hmmm I find out who the 24th was that went back and recast yes I will personally hunt down on the server and awpzoriZe your face while repeatedly singing war pigs for my team to hear! Please save my team! Edited May 29, 2013 by turnbullTeRRoR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
san` May 29, 2013 Share san` GC Alumni May 29, 2013 The people have spoken. Awps shall hereby be restricted to two per team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts