Post your 3DMark and PCMark scores here

[Ruff_Ryder]

Anybody running 3DMark05?

[Birdman]

New best for me.

[TeK]

I just ran 3dmark01 for trying to test my comp.

 

I got 16031 with 1024 no AA and 32bit color.

 

Seems VERY low for my system.

 

x800xt

a64 3500+

1gig ram

 

No OCing all stock and default.

 

I could be wrong tho. Any thoughts?

Edited December 30, 2004 by TeK

[Birdman]

That is a bit low.

 

I got another new high.

 

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8346915

23,117 in 3dmark 2001.

 

Here's my setup.

 

[431w Enermax Power Supply]-[AMD Athlon 64 3200+ @2.5GHz@1.55V]-[ThermalRight XP90 w/ 92mm Sunon]-[ABIT AV8]-[1024MB Corsair PC3200XL]-[Radeon 9800XT]-[180GXP w/8MB cache HD]-[Pl3xt0r Plexwriter 24/10/40]-[Pioneer 106/S DVD Drive ]-[NEC 22" MultiSync FE2111]- [sB Audigy]

[Mini_Me]

17572 for new system...fresh install, no tweaks, stock settings.

 

p4/3.2e/x800 pro

 

what are some standard 'tweaks' for a system?

I have always just run stock..no OC'ing anything, or gpu programs, etc..

[Birdman]

Well.

To start. You can lower the latency of your RAM by running the tightest stable timings possible. A lot of people will run something close to a 3-3-3-8 timing. But if you crank some voltage to your ram and run tighter timings like 2-2-2-5 you'll boost 3dmark scores. Another is to try benchmark runs with AGP fast writes on and off. Most of the time this won't make a difference, but in older systems having it on will speed your scores up some.

 

You can always slide your video card driver image quality bars to performance for about a 300 point improvement in 3dmark 2001 too.

 

A good defrag seems to help at times, and even if it doesn't help your score it should help regular windows performance.

 

I always like to shut every program I have running down while running a benchmark. No firewall or antivirus. Close my IM services. Turn the screen saver off, and set my back ground to a plain black wallpaper, that is, no 5MB jpeg's for a desktop.

 

Setting windows to 16 bit color used to make a difference for me too, but i havent tried it in awhile.

 

A lil' overclock on your video card or processor never hurt either. You don't need anything too radical at first. Just try it with a 5-10MHz increase in speed.

 

Nice motherboard btw Mini. It is a great board for tweaking.

Edited January 6, 2005 by Birdman

[Penty]

hmmm nobody has posted 3DMark05 Scores yet, I'll have to run an earlier version.

 

My new System:

 

AMD 64 3500+ (90nm)

2.0 GB Ram

MSI 6800

A8N-SLI Deluxe (haven't purchased the second card yet.)

 

20001 - 18387

3DMark03 - 8343

3DMark05 - 3335

Edited February 11, 2005 by Penty

[VenomHowell]

Specs:

 

-Asus A8V Deluxe

-AMD Athlon 64 3500+

-2 x 512 MB DDR PC3200

-80 GB Maxtor SATA HD 7200RPM

-Radeon X800 PRO

 

3DMark05 Result - 4 759

[Preacher]

Asus A8V Dx

AMD64 3400+

2 x 512 MB DDR PC3200

120gb WD 7200 IDE

Radeon HS 9600XT 256mb Plat.

 

PC Mark04 - 4209

3D Mark05 - 1956

Edited March 25, 2005 by Preacher

[wayfarer]

Here is what I scored with new system.

3DMARK03- 12096

3DMARK05- 5840

 

Right out of the box no overclocking, or tweaks.

 

CPU - AMD athlon 64 3400+ 2.4ghz

MOBO - Foxconn sis 755

RAM - DDR 512mb 400mhz pc3200 ram x 2 (waiting for third!)

VID CARD - ATI X850 XT RADEON 256mb w/ Catalyst driver

SOUND CARD - Realtek AC97 Audio

OP - microsoft windows XP

 

[tm*]

Ha I'll give you guys My Scores On 3Dmark 05 when I get my new parts

 

 

ATM i've got An AMD1700+ , Geforce 4MX440 64MB, 256MB DDR memory, Asus A7S333,

 

 

The New Parts Im Getting Are:

 

AMD 64 FX-55, Geforce 6800Ultra (might get another on SLI), 2048MB DDR400 memory, Asus A8N-SLI.

 

 

Any Perdictions On my 3DMark 05 Score??

 

Tm*

[-=SKArface=-]

3dmark05 score

 

5637

 

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP

DirectX Version 9.0c

Mobo Manufacturer

Mobo Model

AGP Rates (Current/Available) N/A / N/A

CPU Intel Pentium 4 3464 MHz

FSB 0 MHz

Memory 2048 MB

 

Display Information

Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON X850 XT

Driver Name RADEON X850 XT

Driver Version 6.14.10.6490

Driver Status WHQL - FM Approved

Video Memory 256 MB

Core Clock 519 MHz

Memory Clock 540 MHz

 

 

 

http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Inde...rojectId=920501

[rewind]

Main Test Results

3DMark Score 10561 3DMarks

CPU Score 1184 CPUMarks

 

Detailed Test Results

 

Game Tests

GT1 - Wings of Fury 305.9 fps

GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 80.6 fps

GT3 - Troll's Lair 65.9 fps

GT4 - Mother Nature 57.9 fps

 

CPU Tests

CPU Test 1 131.6 fps

CPU Test 2 21.1 fps

 

Feature Tests

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 3110.5 MTexels/s

Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 5449.8 MTexels/s

Vertex Shader 31.8 fps

Pixel Shader 2.0 164.8 fps

Ragtroll 49.4 fps

 

Sound Tests

No sounds 74.8 fps

24 sounds 68.5 fps

60 sounds Not Supported

[EbilDustBunny]

System Test Suite (PCMARK04)

Multithreaded Test 1 / File Compression 2.74 MB/s

Multithreaded Test 1 / File Encryption 30.52 MB/s

Multithreaded Test 2 / File Decompression 24.39 MB/s

Multithreaded Test 2 / Image Processing 12.03 MPixels/s

Multithreaded Test 3 / Virus Scanning 1712.95 MB/s

Multithreaded Test 3 / Grammar Check 3.06 KB/s

File Decryption 60.74 MB/s

Audio Conversion 2614.97 KB/s

Web Page Rendering 4.68 Pages/s

WMV Video Compression Test failed (why? i dunno)

DivX Video Compression 53.6 FPS

Physics Calculation and 3D 167.31 FPS

Graphics Memory - 64 Lines 1628.84 FPS

 

Here's that Performance test 6.0

CPU:

-Interger Math = 60.9

-Floating point Math= 346.4

-Find prime numbers= 137.7

-SSE/3DNow! = 1324.1

-Encyption = 13

Image Rotation = 270.9

String Sorting = 1018

 

GFX:

3D simple =1368.7

3D medium =241.7

3D complex = 26.4

CPU Mark = 405.6

3D GFX MarK = 523.8

Pass Mark Rating 172.4

Edited December 7, 2005 by EbilDustBunny

[Vovik]

stock @ 2.8Ghz with RAM @ 400Mhz:

3dMark03* - 12,468

-----

@ 3.0Ghz with RAM @ 428Mhz (3-4-4-8):

3dMark03* - 12,657

-----

@ 3.27Ghz and RAM @ 332Mhz (2.5-3-3-5):

3dMark03* - 12,800 (and CATALYST 5.12)

-----

@ 3.36Ghz and RAM @ 480Mhz (3-4-4-8):

3dMark03* - 13,147

-----

@3.46Ghz and RAM @ 398 (2.5-3-3-5)

3dMark03* - 13,202 (Using BIG TYPHOON for cooling)

 

*no videocard OC

Edited May 10, 2006 by Vovik

[PYRO]

3DMARK03 score :17309

 

All settings on my computer are defaults.

[Kruten]

A64 3500+ stock

PCMark04:4220

3DMark05: 3540

 

A64 3500+ @ 2.5Ghz

PCMark04: 4780

3DMark05: 3540

 

My ram really hurts me on these things. Limited to 147.5Mhz....

 

Anyways, give me a couple of weeks till I get my Opteron 165, x1800xt, Mushkin Redline, and WD Raptor. Mwhahahaha!!!!!

[Kruten]

[dragonfly]

gulp! 3DMark05: 781. I rest my case.

[Cujo]

here you go tek!

 

 

edit - all stock settings in program and drivers.

Edited June 19, 2006 by Cujo

[Tek-Almighty]

 

Thanks Cujo...not trying to be a jerk or nothin, but I thought to make it official, as I tweak my system, we can show how we're doing.

 

Not only that, but I want to back up my claims that the 7900 GT is a good card...right?

 

Now, let's look at this Kruten. what the heck is going on here...error?

 

I cannot believe that you got a 11000 with an FX-53 and 6800GT???!!!???

 

I have the equiv proc of a FX-55 (when OC'd) and a 7900GT...and I only get 9500 (approx)...

 

What gives?

[Kruten]

Thanks Cujo...not trying to be a jerk or nothin, but I thought to make it official, as I tweak my system, we can show how we're doing.

 

Not only that, but I want to back up my claims that the 7900 GT is a good card...right?

 

Now, let's look at this Kruten. what the heck is going on here...error?

 

I cannot believe that you got a 11000 with an FX-53 and 6800GT???!!!???

 

I have the equiv proc of a FX-55 (when OC'd) and a 7900GT...and I only get 9500 (approx)...

 

What gives?

 

Well that was too long ago for me to remember but I'm pretty sure I edited that in paint.

 

EDIT: Yeah there we go.

 

Edited June 19, 2006 by Kruten

[VooDooPC]

The white box around the score was a dead give away.

[Cujo]

7900gt is a good card but 3dmark 2005 doesn't like nvidia. try 2006. ignore the total score and cpu portitions. we can compare the sm2 and sm3 scores.

 

also, i will dl fear overnight and run it tomorrow.

Edited June 19, 2006 by Cujo

[Tek-Almighty]

 

Hmmm..well, if that is so, then I would say that I am pretty close in performance to you...almost.

 

I am going to download and run that source stress test you told and post that. I am about 1 hour away from reinstalling FEAR...so soon, that will be up.

 

I would like to post my old system benches as well as new, so that I can compare. So far I've gone from 5015 in 3dmark05 to what you see here...just by upgrading my gpu. Not a bad boost for $289.