Ruff_Ryder December 23, 2004 Share Ruff_Ryder Member December 23, 2004 Anybody running 3DMark05? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdman December 27, 2004 Share Birdman Member December 27, 2004 New best for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeK December 30, 2004 Share TeK Member December 30, 2004 (edited) I just ran 3dmark01 for trying to test my comp. I got 16031 with 1024 no AA and 32bit color. Seems VERY low for my system. x800xt a64 3500+ 1gig ram No OCing all stock and default. I could be wrong tho. Any thoughts? Edited December 30, 2004 by TeK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdman January 4, 2005 Share Birdman Member January 4, 2005 That is a bit low. I got another new high. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8346915 23,117 in 3dmark 2001. Here's my setup. [431w Enermax Power Supply]-[AMD Athlon 64 3200+ @2.5GHz@1.55V]-[ThermalRight XP90 w/ 92mm Sunon]-[ABIT AV8]-[1024MB Corsair PC3200XL]-[Radeon 9800XT]-[180GXP w/8MB cache HD]-[Pl3xt0r Plexwriter 24/10/40]-[Pioneer 106/S DVD Drive ]-[NEC 22" MultiSync FE2111]- [sB Audigy] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mini_Me January 6, 2005 Share Mini_Me GC Founder January 6, 2005 17572 for new system...fresh install, no tweaks, stock settings. p4/3.2e/x800 pro what are some standard 'tweaks' for a system? I have always just run stock..no OC'ing anything, or gpu programs, etc.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdman January 6, 2005 Share Birdman Member January 6, 2005 (edited) Well. To start. You can lower the latency of your RAM by running the tightest stable timings possible. A lot of people will run something close to a 3-3-3-8 timing. But if you crank some voltage to your ram and run tighter timings like 2-2-2-5 you'll boost 3dmark scores. Another is to try benchmark runs with AGP fast writes on and off. Most of the time this won't make a difference, but in older systems having it on will speed your scores up some. You can always slide your video card driver image quality bars to performance for about a 300 point improvement in 3dmark 2001 too. A good defrag seems to help at times, and even if it doesn't help your score it should help regular windows performance. I always like to shut every program I have running down while running a benchmark. No firewall or antivirus. Close my IM services. Turn the screen saver off, and set my back ground to a plain black wallpaper, that is, no 5MB jpeg's for a desktop. Setting windows to 16 bit color used to make a difference for me too, but i havent tried it in awhile. A lil' overclock on your video card or processor never hurt either. You don't need anything too radical at first. Just try it with a 5-10MHz increase in speed. Nice motherboard btw Mini. It is a great board for tweaking. Edited January 6, 2005 by Birdman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penty February 10, 2005 Share Penty Member February 10, 2005 (edited) hmmm nobody has posted 3DMark05 Scores yet, I'll have to run an earlier version. My new System: AMD 64 3500+ (90nm) 2.0 GB Ram MSI 6800 A8N-SLI Deluxe (haven't purchased the second card yet.) 20001 - 18387 3DMark03 - 8343 3DMark05 - 3335 Edited February 11, 2005 by Penty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VenomHowell February 25, 2005 Share VenomHowell Member February 25, 2005 Specs: -Asus A8V Deluxe -AMD Athlon 64 3500+ -2 x 512 MB DDR PC3200 -80 GB Maxtor SATA HD 7200RPM -Radeon X800 PRO 3DMark05 Result - 4 759 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Preacher March 25, 2005 Share Preacher Member March 25, 2005 (edited) Asus A8V Dx AMD64 3400+ 2 x 512 MB DDR PC3200 120gb WD 7200 IDE Radeon HS 9600XT 256mb Plat. PC Mark04 - 4209 3D Mark05 - 1956 Edited March 25, 2005 by Preacher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayfarer May 21, 2005 Share wayfarer Member May 21, 2005 Here is what I scored with new system. 3DMARK03- 12096 3DMARK05- 5840 Right out of the box no overclocking, or tweaks. CPU - AMD athlon 64 3400+ 2.4ghz MOBO - Foxconn sis 755 RAM - DDR 512mb 400mhz pc3200 ram x 2 (waiting for third!) VID CARD - ATI X850 XT RADEON 256mb w/ Catalyst driver SOUND CARD - Realtek AC97 Audio OP - microsoft windows XP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tm* June 2, 2005 Share tm* Member June 2, 2005 Ha I'll give you guys My Scores On 3Dmark 05 when I get my new parts ATM i've got An AMD1700+ , Geforce 4MX440 64MB, 256MB DDR memory, Asus A7S333, The New Parts Im Getting Are: AMD 64 FX-55, Geforce 6800Ultra (might get another on SLI), 2048MB DDR400 memory, Asus A8N-SLI. Any Perdictions On my 3DMark 05 Score?? Tm* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-=SKArface=- June 10, 2005 Share -=SKArface=- Member June 10, 2005 3dmark05 score 5637 Operating System Microsoft Windows XP DirectX Version 9.0c Mobo Manufacturer Mobo Model AGP Rates (Current/Available) N/A / N/A CPU Intel Pentium 4 3464 MHz FSB 0 MHz Memory 2048 MB Display Information Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON X850 XT Driver Name RADEON X850 XT Driver Version 6.14.10.6490 Driver Status WHQL - FM Approved Video Memory 256 MB Core Clock 519 MHz Memory Clock 540 MHz http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Inde...rojectId=920501 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rewind September 8, 2005 Share rewind Member September 8, 2005 Main Test Results 3DMark Score 10561 3DMarks CPU Score 1184 CPUMarks Detailed Test Results Game Tests GT1 - Wings of Fury 305.9 fps GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 80.6 fps GT3 - Troll's Lair 65.9 fps GT4 - Mother Nature 57.9 fps CPU Tests CPU Test 1 131.6 fps CPU Test 2 21.1 fps Feature Tests Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 3110.5 MTexels/s Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 5449.8 MTexels/s Vertex Shader 31.8 fps Pixel Shader 2.0 164.8 fps Ragtroll 49.4 fps Sound Tests No sounds 74.8 fps 24 sounds 68.5 fps 60 sounds Not Supported Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EbilDustBunny December 7, 2005 Share EbilDustBunny GC Alumni December 7, 2005 (edited) System Test Suite (PCMARK04) Multithreaded Test 1 / File Compression 2.74 MB/s Multithreaded Test 1 / File Encryption 30.52 MB/s Multithreaded Test 2 / File Decompression 24.39 MB/s Multithreaded Test 2 / Image Processing 12.03 MPixels/s Multithreaded Test 3 / Virus Scanning 1712.95 MB/s Multithreaded Test 3 / Grammar Check 3.06 KB/s File Decryption 60.74 MB/s Audio Conversion 2614.97 KB/s Web Page Rendering 4.68 Pages/s WMV Video Compression Test failed (why? i dunno) DivX Video Compression 53.6 FPS Physics Calculation and 3D 167.31 FPS Graphics Memory - 64 Lines 1628.84 FPS Here's that Performance test 6.0 CPU: -Interger Math = 60.9 -Floating point Math= 346.4 -Find prime numbers= 137.7 -SSE/3DNow! = 1324.1 -Encyption = 13 Image Rotation = 270.9 String Sorting = 1018 GFX: 3D simple =1368.7 3D medium =241.7 3D complex = 26.4 CPU Mark = 405.6 3D GFX MarK = 523.8 Pass Mark Rating 172.4 Edited December 7, 2005 by EbilDustBunny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vovik December 10, 2005 Share Vovik Member December 10, 2005 (edited) stock @ 2.8Ghz with RAM @ 400Mhz: 3dMark03* - 12,468 ----- @ 3.0Ghz with RAM @ 428Mhz (3-4-4-8): 3dMark03* - 12,657 ----- @ 3.27Ghz and RAM @ 332Mhz (2.5-3-3-5): 3dMark03* - 12,800 (and CATALYST 5.12) ----- @ 3.36Ghz and RAM @ 480Mhz (3-4-4-8): 3dMark03* - 13,147 ----- @3.46Ghz and RAM @ 398 (2.5-3-3-5) 3dMark03* - 13,202 (Using BIG TYPHOON for cooling) *no videocard OC Edited May 10, 2006 by Vovik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PYRO December 21, 2005 Share PYRO Member December 21, 2005 3DMARK03 score :17309 All settings on my computer are defaults. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kruten January 4, 2006 Share Kruten Member January 4, 2006 A64 3500+ stock PCMark04:4220 3DMark05: 3540 A64 3500+ @ 2.5Ghz PCMark04: 4780 3DMark05: 3540 My ram really hurts me on these things. Limited to 147.5Mhz.... Anyways, give me a couple of weeks till I get my Opteron 165, x1800xt, Mushkin Redline, and WD Raptor. Mwhahahaha!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kruten January 17, 2006 Share Kruten Member January 17, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragonfly May 10, 2006 Share dragonfly Member May 10, 2006 gulp! 3DMark05: 781. I rest my case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo June 19, 2006 Share Cujo Member June 19, 2006 (edited) here you go tek! edit - all stock settings in program and drivers. Edited June 19, 2006 by Cujo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tek-Almighty June 19, 2006 Share Tek-Almighty Member June 19, 2006 Thanks Cujo...not trying to be a jerk or nothin, but I thought to make it official, as I tweak my system, we can show how we're doing. Not only that, but I want to back up my claims that the 7900 GT is a good card...right? Now, let's look at this Kruten. what the heck is going on here...error? I cannot believe that you got a 11000 with an FX-53 and 6800GT???!!!??? I have the equiv proc of a FX-55 (when OC'd) and a 7900GT...and I only get 9500 (approx)... What gives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kruten June 19, 2006 Share Kruten Member June 19, 2006 (edited) Thanks Cujo...not trying to be a jerk or nothin, but I thought to make it official, as I tweak my system, we can show how we're doing. Not only that, but I want to back up my claims that the 7900 GT is a good card...right? Now, let's look at this Kruten. what the heck is going on here...error? I cannot believe that you got a 11000 with an FX-53 and 6800GT???!!!??? I have the equiv proc of a FX-55 (when OC'd) and a 7900GT...and I only get 9500 (approx)... What gives? Well that was too long ago for me to remember but I'm pretty sure I edited that in paint. EDIT: Yeah there we go. Edited June 19, 2006 by Kruten Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VooDooPC June 19, 2006 Share VooDooPC Member June 19, 2006 The white box around the score was a dead give away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo June 19, 2006 Share Cujo Member June 19, 2006 (edited) 7900gt is a good card but 3dmark 2005 doesn't like nvidia. try 2006. ignore the total score and cpu portitions. we can compare the sm2 and sm3 scores. also, i will dl fear overnight and run it tomorrow. Edited June 19, 2006 by Cujo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tek-Almighty June 19, 2006 Share Tek-Almighty Member June 19, 2006 Hmmm..well, if that is so, then I would say that I am pretty close in performance to you...almost. I am going to download and run that source stress test you told and post that. I am about 1 hour away from reinstalling FEAR...so soon, that will be up. I would like to post my old system benches as well as new, so that I can compare. So far I've gone from 5015 in 3dmark05 to what you see here...just by upgrading my gpu. Not a bad boost for $289. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now